Which view is most likely to be held by Scientific Humanists?

Scientific Humanists primarily advocate for understanding the universe through reason, empirical evidence, and scientific methodology. This perspective posits that knowledge is ideally acquired through observation, experimentation, and rational thought, rather than relying on faith or supernatural explanations.

This viewpoint aligns with the fundamental tenets of Scientific Humanism, which emphasize human reason and ethical living grounded in science and human welfare. By prioritizing an evidence-based approach, Scientific Humanists believe that human beings can make informed decisions about their lives and societies, thereby fostering progress and understanding.

The other options reflect beliefs that may not resonate with the Scientific Humanist framework. For instance, the idea that scientific progress will validate supernatural claims contradicts the core principle of skepticism towards unprovable assertions. Similarly, concerns regarding genetic engineering being in conflict with individual rights stem from ethical and philosophical debates, but Scientific Humanism primarily focuses on understanding and advancing human potential through rational approaches, rather than moral dilemmas. Lastly, while sharing resources can be a valuable intellectual proposition, it is not a central tenet of Scientific Humanism, which instead emphasizes the pursuit of knowledge and reasoning as primary tools for human happiness and progress.